On 9/6/06, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu> wrote:
I think we are discussing consequences of that definition that are
non-obvious. RFC 2026 requires that two interoperable implementations
exist. However I believe that there is a strong IETF consensus that
our specs need to support universal interoperability.
How do we test "universal interoperability"? MUSTs need to be testable.
And why would we put the definition in Brian's document?
--
Robert Sayre
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf