Phillip - I asked that years ago when I was part of DNSO (Feel free to jump
in any time Hey- The IETF needs to admit it has a real membership and vote
on things. I think the NOMCOM process is a sham and setup with some
technological spin to justify its independence when the whole process needs
to be done away with.
For today - I'll settle for term limits - 2 or at most 3 passes through
NOMCOM for life - doesn't matter what the roles are. But I also want formal
plans from the parties selected and published. I want to know what it is
those parties volunteering to fill those roles plan to do while their in
office.
By the way - the NOMCOM process is also quite biased in that eliminates
people who don't attend the meetings but who may be of tremendous value to
the Program. Anyone who cannot afford the global travel required is exempted
from the process and based on that its pretty funny. The NOMCOM process is
neither fair nor reasonable in a day and age where remote appearances are OK
for most any and all meetings.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com>
To: "todd glassey" <tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net>; "Bill Fenner"
<fenner(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>; <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 7:05 AM
Subject: RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack
ofcommunicaiton here...
I don't see any issue with NOMCON term limits.
The question to ask is why is there a NOMCON at all. Why not do what every
other major professional body does and hold elections with the electorate
being defined in the same way that NOMCON membership is?
I am not aware that this procedure has caused significant problems in the
IEEE or the ABA. Those are also volunteer organizations.
-----Original Message-----
From: todd glassey [mailto:tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 9:11 AM
To: Bill Fenner; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be
lack ofcommunicaiton here...
I originally said two...and would prefer that.
What I am saying is that there should be a total of two or
three instances as a NOMCOM candidate and that is a much
different statement than figuring who is in office now and
who is eligible...As to what it prevents-career Internet
Standards jockey's.
And since the purpose is to keep the IETF honest, I want the
same term limits for any and all IETF positions, including
the TRUST as well.
By the way - has anyone seen a Business Plan for the TRUST
and what it is supposed to do? I don't mean some fictional
set of ideas - I mean the business plan. I want to see
exactly what the Trust is responsible for and how its to be measured,
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Fenner" <fenner(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
To: "todd glassey" <tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net>
Cc: "IETF-Discussion" <>
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be
lack of communicaiton here...
On 9/4/06, todd glassey <tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net> wrote:
Its time to talk about term limits for NOMCOM
appointments. Two or maybe
three terms at most are enough.
Todd,
Given that there are no standing IESG appointees that have served
for three terms, what exactly would making such a rule change?
Arkko, Jari 0.2
Callon, Ross 0.2
Carpenter, Brian 0.7
Dusseault, Lisa 0.2
Eggert, Lars 0.2
Fenner, Bill 2.5
Hardie, Ted 1.7
Hartman, Sam 0.8
Housley, Russ 1.7
Jennings, Cullen 0.2
Kessens, David 1.3
Peterson, Jon 1.7
Romascanu, Dan 0.2
Townsley, Mark 0.7
Westerlund, Magnus 0.2
(This is "AD" and "number of terms served", where "numbers of terms
served" is counted by adding up the number of IETFs the AD is listed
under at http://www.ietf.org/iesg_mem.html and dividing by 6)
Bill
[to be fair, 2 of the above positions didn't exist until
their holders
were appointed 0.2 terms ago]
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf