ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)

2006-09-08 07:20:27

From: Jeffrey Hutzelman [mailto:jhutz(_at_)cmu(_dot_)edu] 


On Thursday, September 07, 2006 08:12:44 PM -0700 
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" 
<pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> wrote:

The solution to this particular problem is to use SSL as 
the transport.
IMAP and POP both support this use. It is a trivial matter 
to discover 
that IMAPS is supported using an SRV record.

Of course, if you depend on this technique to determine 
whether TLS should be used, you are subject to a downgrade 
attack which not only exposes your password to a dictionary 
attack, but also makes it fairly simple for an attacker to 
gain access to the server as you _without_ carrying out such 
an attack.

How so?

The attacker cannot downgrade the server security, particularly if the server 
does not support unencrypted IMAP or POP.

If you deploy DNSSEC the downgrade attack can be eliminated.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>