On Thursday, September 07, 2006 07:48:45 PM -0400 Jeffrey Hutzelman
<jhutz(_at_)cmu(_dot_)edu> wrote:
Well, he could ask that 2195 be advanced as-is, but I would expect such
an effort to fail, as that version has turned out to be somewhat
underspecified. Multiple interoperable implementations is not the _old_
criteria for advancement; it is necessary but not sufficient(*).
Ugh.
s/_old_/_only_/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf