ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: what happened to newtrk?

2006-09-06 04:56:37
Brian E Carpenter wrote:

3464 is already DS according to the RFC Index.

Good, the process works, unlike my memory:  I meant 3834,
a few days ago I wrote 3864 instead of 3834 on another
list, so that's the third attempt: 3834.

 [interoperability report]
if {all mandatory and optional features shown to
interoperate}
   then {send a request to reclassify RFC 2195 to the IESG}

So far it sounds simple (for the 2195 example).  I test it,
thanks for info.

Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf