At 04:07 PM 9/7/2006, John C Klensin wrote:
I think we have a small misunderstanding here. Let me say more
clearly and briefly
My message was intended to clarify why the SASL WG is
pursuing an Informational recommendation for its RFC2195bis
work and to redirect any comments specific to this work to
the WG's list.
As it was not my intent to participate in the general
discussion of "fundamental issues with our standards process"
you raise (which is why I changed the subject), and your
follow-up is in the same vein, I won't comment further.
-- Kurt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf