On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 11:07:32AM -0700, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
On Sep 23, 2006, at 2:20 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
But as a matter of fact, draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14 doesn't
define any collations that would actually solve the Unicode NF
issue, so it's not really clear how this helps CalDAV (except that
it now uses a framework in which the solution may become available
in the future).
Maybe the set of initial registrations in <http://tools.ietf.org/
html/draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14#section-9> needs to be extended?
Yes, I agree. That's one of the next steps and why a registry was
created (so we could do it outside the base comparator draft).
Last week Ted & I were discussing whether one could define a Very
Liberal Comparator (VLC) for general use. It would be handy to have
one which matched e with E, é, è É... and matched o with O, ø, ô, and
so on. That would help in calendar searching use cases, e.g. a user
who can't type in accents (or doesn't know how) wants to find the
invitation from André by searching for "andre". It would probably be
useful in many other cross-language or unknown-language situations too.
Such a comparator would be most useful for exact and substring
matches; I don't know offhand how it would best do ordering so it
might not be as useful for ordering.
I believe Arnt intends to continue working on this general problem,
for which I'm very grateful, and other contributions would be most
welcome.
Lisa
http://author.handalak.com/archives/042003/000078
--bill
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf