ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]

2006-09-18 07:20:05
from [Bill Fenner] [Permanent Link] 
On 9/18/06, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:

I have not done the work to review velocity from -00 to RFC, but perhaps
Bill Fenner has.


I haven't; I've been concentrating on the IESG part of the document lifecycle.

 Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin
Next by Date:  Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Theodore Tso
Previous by Thread:  Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
Next by Thread:  Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]