ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]

2006-09-20 02:51:26
from [Eliot Lear] [Permanent Link] 
I garbled:

To the IESG's credit you did provide at least
something of a menu of options, but it was
  


... not clear you would advance a draft even if we advanced one of those
options.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
Next by Date:  Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Spencer Dawkins
Previous by Thread:  Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
Next by Thread:  Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]