I originally said two...and would prefer that.
What I am saying is that there should be a total of two or three instances
as a NOMCOM candidate and that is a much different statement than figuring
who is in office now and who is eligible...As to what it prevents-career
Internet Standards jockey's.
And since the purpose is to keep the IETF honest, I want the same term
limits for any and all IETF positions, including the TRUST as well.
By the way - has anyone seen a Business Plan for the TRUST and what it is
supposed to do? I don't mean some fictional set of ideas - I mean the
business plan. I want to see exactly what the Trust is responsible for and
how its to be measured,
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Fenner" <fenner(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
To: "todd glassey" <tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net>
Cc: "IETF-Discussion" <>
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of
communicaiton here...
On 9/4/06, todd glassey <tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net> wrote:
Its time to talk about term limits for NOMCOM appointments. Two or maybe
three terms at most are enough.
Todd,
Given that there are no standing IESG appointees that have served
for three terms, what exactly would making such a rule change?
Arkko, Jari 0.2
Callon, Ross 0.2
Carpenter, Brian 0.7
Dusseault, Lisa 0.2
Eggert, Lars 0.2
Fenner, Bill 2.5
Hardie, Ted 1.7
Hartman, Sam 0.8
Housley, Russ 1.7
Jennings, Cullen 0.2
Kessens, David 1.3
Peterson, Jon 1.7
Romascanu, Dan 0.2
Townsley, Mark 0.7
Westerlund, Magnus 0.2
(This is "AD" and "number of terms served", where "numbers of terms
served" is counted by adding up the number of IETFs the AD is listed
under at http://www.ietf.org/iesg_mem.html and dividing by 6)
Bill
[to be fair, 2 of the above positions didn't exist until their holders
were appointed 0.2 terms ago]
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf