Phill,
There is no need to define the concept of membership. The term 'membership'
is essentially a legal term and the courts will define it according to their
convenience. One can be a member without having a vote and can have a vote
without being a member.
Under English Common Law saying that a thing is so does not make it so. If a
an agreement that meets the legal definition of a partnership agreement
explicitly states that it is not a partnership agreement that does not make
it any less a partnership nor does it extinguish the liabilities, &ct. of
such.
All that is needed to hold an election is to define the franchise. The
franchise in this case would be defined in the same manner as the NOMCON is
at present.
"I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Net."
Can we stop arguing about what could be and concern ourselves with what
we want? If we are happy with what we have then let's simply stop arguing.
Eliot
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf