ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)

2006-09-06 10:19:02
At 17:35 06/09/2006, Keith Moore wrote:
If the web were split across several networks with dissimilar characteristics, it would be much more difficult to arrange seamless access via proxies.

The "if" is the reality. Forgetting about it does simplifies things. This is like computing the trajectory of a rocket in using scientif formulas without corrections. Simpler, but you miss the target.

Ask the Chinese people if it was as seamless for them as for you to access the Internet in your mother tongue. Now it is, because they split their extenet from yours, in a way which works and hurts no one. But it was more difficult. What is poor is that such a way should have been first documented by the IETF, based upon an IAB guidance. So we could have an optimal, or common solution. Like in the HTTP.1.1 case.
jfc



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>