-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Hartman [mailto:hartmans-ietf(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 10:28 AM
To: Susan Thomson (sethomso)
Cc: Narayanan, Vidya; nea(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org;
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint
Assessment (nea)
"Susan" == Susan Thomson (sethomso) <sethomso(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
writes:
Susan> Hi Vidya Inline ...
>> -----Original Message----- From: Narayanan, Vidya
>> [mailto:vidyan(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006
>> 2:15 AM To: iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org Cc:
nea(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
>> Subject: RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint
>> Assessment (nea)
>>
>> All,
>>
>> This charter is definitely clearer on some of the points that
>> were discussed based on the last version, but a couple of
>> things still remain to be clarified. Based on several
>> discussions that we've had lately, I have two suggestions for
>> further clarity:
>>
>> 1. Let's add the text suggested by Harald and Lakshminath
>> (there seemed to be agreement on this text on the
>> list). Quoting the change proposed:
>>
>> Replace:
>>
>> "NEA can be limited in its applicability when the endpoint and
>> the organization providing network access are owned by
>> different parties."
>>
>> with
>>
>> "NEA is applicable to computing environments of enterprises
>> where endpoints accessing the enterprise's network are owned
>> and/or expected to conform to the policies set forth by the
>> organization that owns and operates the network. All other
>> cases are outside the scope of the NEA charter, since we do not
>> know that NEA would be useful in such cases."
>>
Susan> I don't think there is consensus around this text, and I
Susan> can think of existing deployment scenarios that might be
Susan> ruled out by this text and also where it might be
Susan> considered to be too broad.
Ah. Count me as one in favor of the text (although I do not
object to the old text). I didn't speak up because I thought
there was consensus.
I thought so as well. There were a few who explicitly agreed and I saw
no disagreements on the list.
Vidya
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf