-----Original Message-----
From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:smb(_at_)cs(_dot_)columbia(_dot_)edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:21 PM
To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
Cc: iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; secdir(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu;
M(_dot_)Handley(_at_)cs(_dot_)ucl(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk;
Isidor Kouvelas (kouvelas); Tony Speakman (speakman);
lorenzo(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com; pim-chairs(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org;
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review comments for
draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:14:35 -0800
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
I would like to understand better why ...
no automated key management
is specified.
Do they cite any of the reasons listed in RFC 4107?
[Joe] No, but some of them may apply. Thanks for the reference
reminder.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf