My experience is that Gen-ART reviews are very useful. Whether they
need
to be posted to this list or not is another question. I think they
would
be just as useful without the posting, but I like to at least see the
initial review. I don't think the issues need to be resolved on this
list, however.
Mark
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
Brian,
As a recent "victim" of a Gen-ART review, I can only say that it
improved the quality of the RFC-to-be (thanks, Spencer!). And the
reviews might encourage other people to read the draft that might
not otherwise had a chance to be aware of it. So yeah, keep them
coming!
Cheers,
Andy
On 2/13/07, Brian E Carpenter <brc(_at_)zurich(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com > wrote: Hi,
As devoted readers may have noticed, quite a few Gen-ART reviews
have been copied to this list recently, with follow-up postings
in some cases.
Is this a good or a bad thing?
Comments welcome.
Brian (as General AD)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf