At 4:47 PM +0100 2/13/07, Julian Reschke wrote:
Mark Baugher schrieb:
My experience is that Gen-ART reviews are very useful. Whether they need
to be posted to this list or not is another question. I think they would
be just as useful without the posting, but I like to at least see the
initial review. I don't think the issues need to be resolved on this
list, however.
+1
Optimally, the review should be sent to the mailing list where the
initial spec development took place, as well (there'll alway be one,
and in doubt it will be mentioned in the front matter of the
document, right :-).
+.5
A possible rule-of-thumb would be:
If it is all editorial comments, there is no need to sent it to
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_) If there are any suggested changes to the protocol /
requirements / whatever, or if the tone is "I don't understand what
is going on here", send it to ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org so others can see and
maybe comment on those suggestions and questions.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf