At 2:36 PM +0900 7/1/07, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> > Maybe we are getting to the point in time where we should only have
> IPv6 at IETF meetings
good luck. Until the ISPs and our corporate networks deploy it, we
can't go there.
to use legacy protocol like IPv4 :-) you can use IPv6-to-IPv4
tranlators like NAT-PT or RFC3142.
NAT-PT (RFC 2766) is being moved to Historic status. RFC 3142 is
Informational. Without a standards-track method for people to use
IPv4, changing a production network to IPv6 seems unwise.
their scalability is no worse
than IPv4-to-IPv4 NAT.
That may be true, but it is also irrelevant, given that the current
production network doesn't use IPv4 NAT at all.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf