Sam,
They are no more specific this year than they have been in the past.
Ok -- I did not re-read the ones from past years. Just reacting on
the current text.
The only change is that they were at least specific in a direction
that would actually compliment the sitting AD.
That's fine.
I personally have never liked the way the security AD requirements
were stated.
Hmm. Ok. Perhaps we should consider stating them in
a better way then?
Jari
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf