At 9:49 AM -0500 7/25/07, Dave Crocker wrote:
Ted Hardie wrote:
A broader solution that encompasses other potential
uses of content negotiation seems to me in order.
Other than probably looking for an interaction mechanism, rather than one
through email, does this have any relationship to:
Content Negotiation for Messaging Services based on Email
<http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3297.html>?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
The SIP preference/capabilities work broadly re-uses the CONNEG framework.
This optimization treats a particular problem with "application" as a top-level
type in the SIP context. Though there are application types in 3297
(application/pdf),
using them in negotiation hits SIP in somewhat different ways. The question is
whether generalizing the subtype content negotiation needed there would be
useful for other content negotiation users.
Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf