ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet AssignedNumbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hocNetworks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard

2007-08-13 06:21:11
    > From: "Teco Boot" <teco(_at_)inf-net(_dot_)nl>

Without taking any position on whether the protocol should be run over IP
directly, or over UDP:

    > UDP overhead is 8 octets, brings checksum

Your wording is a little unclear, so perhaps this comment is not needed, but
UDP does have a way of sending packets without a checksum, so you don't
necessarily have the computational overhead of computing/checking it
(although of course the field is always there - 2 bytes).

    > using a native IP protocol is more in line with other IETF routing
    > protocols.

Like BGP? :-)

        Noel

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet AssignedNumbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hocNetworks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard, Noel Chiappa <=