IETF Discussion (date)
August 31, 2007
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:05
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Doug Ewell, 11:33
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 09:22
- RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 08:29
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Simon Josefsson, 07:35
- Behind the NAT registration, Dangi, 05:47
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Jaap Akkerhuis, 02:04
August 30, 2007
- RFC 1345 as an input method, Harald Alvestrand, 23:39
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Harald Alvestrand, 23:13
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, John C Klensin, 23:01
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Keith Moore, 22:25
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:53
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Randy Presuhn, 19:41
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Ned Freed, 19:14
- Re: History of autoconfig RFCs and siblings, please?, Stig Venaas, 18:42
- Re: History of autoconfig RFCs and siblings, please?, Mark Andrews, 17:38
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Ben Finney, 17:05
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Keith Moore, 17:05
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Ned Freed, 16:49
- Re: History of autoconfig RFCs and siblings, please?, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 16:45
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, John C Klensin, 16:25
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Harald Alvestrand, 16:02
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Lisa Dusseault, 14:53
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], David Schutt, 12:42
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 08:47
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 08:28
- RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], michael.dillon, 08:01
- RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], michael.dillon, 07:55
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Jeroen Massar, 07:35
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 07:25
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:27
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Thomas Narten, 06:13
- Re: Joining IETF, Marshall Eubanks, 05:51
- Joining IETF, Benson III, John Madison, 05:48
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Thomas Narten, 05:17
- RE: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:09
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03:45
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tony Finch, 03:24
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Bill Manning, 01:12
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Masataka Ohta, 01:11
August 29, 2007
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 23:15
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 23:06
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 21:59
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Bill Manning, 21:45
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 20:54
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 20:04
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 20:01
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, David Conrad, 18:57
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Edward Lewis, 18:40
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, John C Klensin, 18:34
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, Mark Andrews, 17:09
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, David Conrad, 16:45
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, Mark Andrews, 16:25
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, David Conrad, 15:30
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, Mark Andrews, 15:26
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], David Conrad, 14:58
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:38
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Edward Lewis, 14:37
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Bill Manning, 14:37
- RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], michael.dillon, 14:22
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Bill Manning, 13:59
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 13:38
- RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Ray Plzak, 13:05
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 12:54
- RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce afterall], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:47
- RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce afterall], Bound, Jim, 11:26
- RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Ray Plzak, 10:39
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 09:58
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Bob Braden, 09:57
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, Ted Hardie, 09:02
- IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Thomas Narten, 08:07
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Roger Jørgensen, 01:58
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, John C Klensin, 00:08
August 28, 2007
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 20:23
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:35
- Re: FW: [Inquiry #96698] Help!, Hex Star, 17:56
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, Mark Andrews, 16:58
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Joel Jaeggli, 16:44
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, David Kessens, 16:43
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Thomas Narten, 16:29
- Re: Business case for IPv6 (Was: Re: one example of an unintendedconsequence of changing the /48 boundary), Marc Manthey, 16:12
- RE: Business case for IPv6 (Was: Re: one example of an unintendedconsequence of changing the /48 boundary), Fleischman, Eric, 15:59
- Business case for IPv6 (Was: Re: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary), Greg Skinner, 15:46
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Joel Jaeggli, 15:46
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, John C Klensin, 15:38
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, David Kessens, 15:08
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 14:09
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 13:59
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 13:57
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 13:40
- IETF standard vs. W3C recommendations, Carlos Narváez, 13:15
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Thomas Narten, 13:14
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Thomas Narten, 13:10
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:10
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Russ Housley, 11:38
- Re: [ppml] IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tommy Perniciaro, 11:11
- RE: [ppml] IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Davis, Terry L, 11:11
- FW: [Inquiry #96698] Help!, Herb Overstreet, 11:11
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service-03.txt, Black_David, 11:11
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, RJ Atkinson, 11:11
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, RJ Atkinson, 11:11
- Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Elisa Boschi, 11:11
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, RJ Atkinson, 11:11
- Vancouver IETF Code Sprint, IETF Chair, 11:11
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, Edward Lewis, 10:29
August 27, 2007
- Re: [ppml] IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Stephen Sprunk, 14:33
- RE: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48boundary, michael.dillon, 14:27
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 13:51
- RE: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the/48boundary, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:22
- Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review, Russ Housley, 12:42
- Features vs benefits, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:13
- Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review, Dave Crocker, 11:49
- Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review, Spencer Dawkins, 11:36
- Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review, Spencer Dawkins, 11:36
- Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt, Ted Hardie, 11:27
- Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review, Jari Arkko, 11:27
- Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review, Russ Housley, 11:07
- RE: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48boundary, Noel Chiappa, 10:47
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Noel Chiappa, 10:44
- Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review, Spencer Dawkins, 10:11
- Re: When will ISP's switch over to IPv6 and how will it affect customers?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:21
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:28
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:19
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Peter Dambier, 04:24
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:11
August 26, 2007
- Re: When will ISP's switch over to IPv6 and how will it affect customers?, Keith Moore, 17:14
- When will ISP's switch over to IPv6 and how will it affect customers?, Hex Star, 16:50
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 16:20
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:54
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 11:34
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Christian Huitema, 08:25
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:55
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, John C Klensin, 06:09
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 04:42
- RE: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48boundary, michael.dillon, 04:20
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 04:03
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 03:56
August 25, 2007
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Ben Finney, 19:12
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Doug Ewell, 16:42
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 10:57
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, John C Klensin, 10:43
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 10:11
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, John C Klensin, 09:50
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 09:30
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, John C Klensin, 09:30
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Christian Huitema, 08:30
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:17
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Ben Finney, 00:41
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Randy Presuhn, 00:08
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 00:00
August 24, 2007
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Ben Finney, 23:35
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Randy Presuhn, 22:50
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings, 21:16
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Ben Finney, 21:02
- Re: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 19:39
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Bob Hinden, 17:25
- Re: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary, Keith Moore, 17:13
- Re: one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary, Thomas Narten, 16:41
- one example of an unintended consequence of changing the /48 boundary, Keith Moore, 15:48
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 15:19
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Lyndon Nerenberg, 15:06
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Roger Jørgensen, 15:05
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tony Li, 14:55
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings, 14:48
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Thomas Narten, 14:37
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 13:47
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 13:33
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 13:27
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 11:58
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 11:50
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 11:45
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov, 11:25
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:18
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:16
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov, 11:01
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings, 10:44
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings, 10:41
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Terry Gray, 10:39
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, David Conrad, 10:19
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:05
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:05
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Roger Jørgensen, 09:53
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarceafter all, Spencer Dawkins, 09:50
- Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Michael Thomas, 09:47
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, David Conrad, 09:47
- Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Roger Jørgensen, 09:39
- RE: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], michael.dillon, 09:17
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, John C Klensin, 08:56
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:47
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, Edward Lewis, 08:44
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, David Conrad, 08:30
- Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 08:15
- Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Jeroen Massar, 07:58
- Re: DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 07:51
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 07:40
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Eric Allman, 07:09
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, Thomas Narten, 06:29
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Noel Chiappa, 06:26
- DNS as 1980s technology [was Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Thomas Narten, 06:23
- RE: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 03:13
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Dave Cridland, 01:34
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 01:06
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 01:02
August 23, 2007
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, David Conrad, 22:50
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, Mark Andrews, 22:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, David Kessens, 22:03
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:55
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Randy Presuhn, 21:35
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 21:35
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, Geoff Huston, 20:18
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Noel Chiappa, 19:02
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 18:13
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 18:12
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 17:57
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, Mark Andrews, 17:57
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, David Conrad, 17:51
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, Geoff Huston, 16:48
- RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Ben Finney, 14:58
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Dave Cridland, 14:26
- RE: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Stephen Kent, 13:59
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Larson, Matt, 13:56
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Sam Hartman, 13:13
- IETF 71: Social Venue Survey, Livingood, Jason, 12:49
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 12:42
- RE: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:26
- Re: e2e, Douglas Otis, 10:57
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Eric Rescorla, 08:25
- Re: e2e, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:13
- Re: e2e, John C Klensin, 03:35
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Christian Vogt, 03:12
August 22, 2007
- Meeting the "requirements" of a BCP, Lakshminath Dondeti, 18:05
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Paul Hoffman, 14:23
- RE: e2e, michael.dillon, 13:42
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Michael Thomas, 12:52
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 12:52
- Re: e2e, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:40
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Stephen Kent, 12:23
- requirement documents, Michael Thomas, 12:04
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 12:01
- Re: e2e, Michael Thomas, 11:45
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 11:00
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Sam Hartman, 10:10
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, John C Klensin, 09:21
- Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Christian Vogt, 08:33
- Re: e2e, Tony Finch, 08:33
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Sam Hartman, 07:41
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Jari Arkko, 07:18
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Hannes Tschofenig, 06:31
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Henning Schulzrinne, 06:12
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Sam Hartman, 04:48
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jari Arkko, 03:27
- Re: e2e, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03:24
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03:04
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:29
August 21, 2007
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 23:44
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Roger Jørgensen, 23:28
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker, 22:56
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), SM, 22:28
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker, 22:27
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Dave Crocker, 22:26
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Paul Hoffman, 22:05
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 20:37
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 20:00
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 19:56
- Re: e2e, Dave Crocker, 19:32
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Douglas Otis, 19:28
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Eric Rescorla, 17:54
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Sam Hartman, 17:36
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 17:30
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Tony Finch, 17:13
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), John C Klensin, 17:01
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Tony Finch, 16:23
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Mark Andrews, 16:19
- Re: e2e, Tony Finch, 16:11
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Paul Hoffman, 16:02
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Eric Rescorla, 12:43
- Re: e2e, Tony Finch, 12:07
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Sam Hartman, 10:07
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:52
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 09:48
- The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:40
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Eric Rescorla, 09:31
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 09:30
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:31
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Suresh Krishnan, 08:22
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Sam Hartman, 07:56
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 06:22
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 06:14
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 06:11
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e), michael.dillon, 02:52
- Re: Informational vs. Informational, Sam Hartman, 02:45
- RE: e2e, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02:12
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:11
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01:38
August 20, 2007
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Rémi Denis-Courmont, 23:40
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker, 20:46
- Re: Informational vs. Informational, Eric Rescorla, 20:25
- Re: e2e, John Day, 18:49
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Steven M. Bellovin, 18:11
- Re: e2e, Michael Thomas, 17:17
- Re: e2e, Dave Crocker, 17:07
- Re: e2e, Fred Baker, 16:49
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Mark Andrews, 16:49
- Is there a need for a standard general XML format for describing computer files?, Trace Bond, 16:28
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker, 16:09
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:51
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e), John C Klensin, 15:28
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Michael Thomas, 15:21
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:17
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:17
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:17
- RE: e2e, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:17
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:17
- Does anybody know where Jim Bell is - is he out of jail?, Joe Baptista, 14:55
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, SM, 14:43
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 12:48
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:26
- Re: Informational vs. Informational, Sam Hartman, 12:10
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 11:36
- Re: Informational vs. Informational, Andy Bierman, 11:04
- Informational vs. Informational, Paul Hoffman, 10:43
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Sam Hartman, 10:13
- Secretariat Services Bidder Comments Sought, Ray Pelletier, 09:38
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, Dave Crocker, 09:02
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, John C Klensin, 08:07
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp-05.txt, JP Vasseur, 05:24
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, RJ Atkinson, 05:24
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-07.txt, Black_David, 05:24
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Roger Jørgensen, 03:23
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 03:00
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:23
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Roger Jørgensen, 00:57
August 19, 2007
- Re: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Martin Duerst, 22:41
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Noel Chiappa, 15:48
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 15:16
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 15:07
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 14:57
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, Dave Crocker, 11:51
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jeroen Massar, 04:12
August 18, 2007
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, David Morris, 22:19
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 22:16
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tony Li, 21:30
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 21:26
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 21:24
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tony Li, 21:23
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tony Li, 21:15
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all - /64 FIB burden oops..., Robin Whittle, 17:58
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 16:43
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 16:37
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Hex Star, 15:40
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jeroen Massar, 15:12
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tony Li, 15:02
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tony Li, 14:48
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Mark Andrews, 14:28
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, David Morris, 12:53
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Terry Gray, 11:35
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 10:02
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, John C Klensin, 10:00
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 10:00
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09:39
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09:39
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, David Conrad, 09:18
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Noel Chiappa, 08:33
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Steven M. Bellovin, 05:52
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 02:06
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 02:04
August 17, 2007
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Eric Rescorla, 22:49
- Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Eliot Lear, 22:27
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 20:27
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all - /64 FIB burden, Robin Whittle, 19:48
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tony Li, 18:07
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Steven M. Bellovin, 17:56
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Tony Li, 17:12
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Joel Jaeggli, 17:03
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 16:47
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, SM, 16:22
- Re: e2e, SM, 16:22
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 16:07
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Joel Jaeggli, 14:34
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Bill Manning, 14:10
- RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp-05.txt, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS, 14:07
- RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 13:56
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Keith Moore, 13:41
- IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, michael.dillon, 13:08
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, John C Klensin, 12:56
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, John Levine, 12:18
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, Steven M. Bellovin, 12:04
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:34
- Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Eric Rescorla, 10:21
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, Henning Schulzrinne, 10:12
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp-05.txt, Elwyn Davies, 09:32
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 09:10
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, Steven M. Bellovin, 08:56
- Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, John C Klensin, 07:11
- the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:52
- New models for email (Re: e2e), John C Klensin, 06:28
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 05:57
- Re: e2e, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:53
August 16, 2007
- Re: e2e, Douglas Otis, 23:47
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:54
- RE: e2e, SM, 16:42
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 15:11
- RE: e2e, michael.dillon, 15:01
- RE: e2e, michael.dillon, 14:50
- Re: e2e, Douglas Otis, 14:37
- RE: e2e, SM, 12:32
- Re: e2e, Douglas Otis, 11:22
- Re: e2e, Tony Finch, 10:08
- Re: e2e, Ted Hardie, 09:28
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 07:57
- Re: e2e, Gunnar Lindberg, 07:46
- RE: e2e, michael.dillon, 06:57
August 15, 2007
- Re: e2e, Greg Skinner, 20:37
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 20:24
- Re: e2e, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:12
- Re: e2e, Tony Finch, 15:02
- Re: e2e, Douglas Otis, 15:00
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 14:07
- Re: e2e, Douglas Otis, 13:56
- Re: e2e, Michael Thomas, 13:54
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 13:47
- Re: e2e, Michael Thomas, 13:44
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore, 13:40
- Re: e2e, Fred Baker, 12:17
August 13, 2007
- RE: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet AssignedNumbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hocNetworks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard, Noel Chiappa, 06:21
- Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet AssignedNumbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hocNetworks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard, Ian Chakeres, 05:13
- RE: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet AssignedNumbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hocNetworks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard, Teco Boot, 05:13
- Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard, Bo Berry, 05:13
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-02, Black_David, 05:13
- Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Elisa Boschi, 05:13
- RE: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Black_David, 05:13
- Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard, Bo Berry, 05:13
- Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard, Ian Chakeres, 05:13
- Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard, Bo Berry, 05:13
- Re: [manet] Last Call: draft-ietf-manet-iana (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group) to Proposed Standard, Ian Chakeres, 05:13
- To post to this list, Prashant Manandhar, 04:56
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Eliot Lear, 00:00
August 10, 2007
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Keith Moore, 11:37
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Eliot Lear, 02:37
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Keith Moore, 00:53
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, michael.dillon, 00:31
- Re: IPv4, Masataka Ohta, 00:17
August 09, 2007
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Michel Py, 22:49
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:53
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Mark Andrews, 17:45
- Re: IPv4, David Kessens, 15:14
- Re: IPv4, Bill Manning, 14:37
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Douglas Otis, 14:31
- Re: IPv4, Stephen Kent, 13:36
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Keith Moore, 13:07
- Re: draft-shirey-secgloss-v2-08.txt, Sam Hartman, 12:29
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 12:12
- Re: IPv4, Bill Manning, 11:43
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Douglas Otis, 11:12
- Re: IPv4, Stephen Kent, 10:22
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Marshall Eubanks, 09:50
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, David Conrad, 09:38
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 09:25
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Marshall Eubanks, 09:18
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Daniel Senie, 09:08
- Re: IPv4, Bill Manning, 09:08
- Re: IPv4, Stephen Kent, 08:11
- Re: draft-shirey-secgloss-v2-08.txt, Stephen Kent, 07:46
- Re: IPv4, Bill Manning, 06:36
- draft-shirey-secgloss-v2-08.txt, David Harrington, 06:34
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Marshall Eubanks, 04:40
August 08, 2007
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Geoff Huston, 21:36
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Ned Freed, 20:56
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Stephen Farrell, 19:22
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Douglas Otis, 19:07
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Ned Freed, 17:08
- Re: IPv4, Stephen Kent, 14:03
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, David Conrad, 13:23
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:39
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:25
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, william(at)elan.net, 11:23
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Paul Hoffman, 11:13
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Paul Hoffman, 11:11
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Douglas Otis, 11:05
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Marshall Eubanks, 10:52
- Question on Half-Open Connection Discovery - RFC 793, Nam_Nguyen, 10:49
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Douglas Otis, 10:37
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:20
- RE: IPv4, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:10
- Re: IPv4, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 07:37
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Keith Moore, 07:33
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:55
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Carsten Bormann, 03:21
- Re: IPv4, Harald Alvestrand, 03:08
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Harald Alvestrand, 03:03
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 01:17
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 00:52
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Rémi Denis-Courmont, 00:42
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-wilson-class-e-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 00:15
August 06, 2007
- Re: what's up with the management, Geoff Huston, 12:48
- RE: IPv4, michael.dillon, 12:13
- Re: what's up with the management, IETF member Dave Aronson, 10:54
- Re: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model, Roger Jørgensen, 08:12
- Re: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:12
- Re: what's up with the management, Joe Abley, 08:01
- Re: what's up with the management, Simon Josefsson, 07:57
- Re: what's up with the management, Joe Abley, 07:44
- Re: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:36
- Re: Ream-Specific IP (Was: IPv4), Eric Burger, 07:22
- Ream-Specific IP (Was: IPv4), Julien Laganier, 07:17
- RE: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:03
August 03, 2007
- Re: selling IPv4 addresses vs. the POTS number model, David Morris, 17:05
- Re: selling IPv4 addresses, Clint Chaplin, 16:56
- Re: selling IPv4 addresses, John Levine, 16:42
- Re: IPv4, Douglas Otis, 16:41
- Re: IPv4, Clint Chaplin, 16:17
- Re: IPv4, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:03
- RE: IPv4, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:56
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Douglas Otis, 14:13
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Dave Crocker, 11:24
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Dave Crocker, 11:24
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Tom.Petch, 11:05
- Re: IPv4, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:31
- RE: Last Call: draft-drage-sipping-service-identification (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for the Identification of Services) to Informational RFC, Atle Monrad (GR/ETO), 05:56
- RE: IPv4, michael.dillon, 05:54
- A prediction (was Re: IPv4), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:42
- what's up with the management, Pekka Savola, 05:27
- RE: IPv4, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 04:33
- Re: IPv4, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 04:10
- RE: IPv4, michael.dillon, 03:35
- Re: IPv4, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 03:10
- Re: IPv4, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:22
- RE: IPv4, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01:21
August 02, 2007
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:55
- Re: IPv4, Keith Moore, 20:43
- Re: IPv4, Douglas Otis, 18:25
- Re: IPv4, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:30
- IPv4, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:50
- Re: DHCP failures, Sam Hartman, 15:03
- Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 13:59
- Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Dave Crocker, 12:17
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Dave Crocker, 12:14
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Keith Moore, 12:03
- RE: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetingsoutside US ?), Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 11:37
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Dave Crocker, 11:24
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, David W. Hankins, 11:07
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Alexey Melnikov, 10:59
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, David W. Hankins, 10:58
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Andy Bierman, 10:51
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Lixia Zhang, 08:57
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Keith Moore, 08:56
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Brian E Carpenter, 07:10
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Frank Kastenholz, 05:10
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Cyrus Daboo, 05:10
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Harald Alvestrand, 02:35
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 00:48
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 00:33
August 01, 2007
- RE: Charging I-Ds, Noel Chiappa, 16:46
- RE: Charging I-Ds, michael.dillon, 15:54
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:13
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:05
- Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Bill Fenner, 13:57
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Keith Moore, 13:50
- Re: Last Call: draft-drage-sipping-service-identification (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for the Identification of Services) to Informational RFC, Eric Burger, 13:47
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), David Conrad, 13:44
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, David W. Hankins, 13:33
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, John C Klensin, 12:01
- RE: Charging I-Ds, Richard Shockey, 12:00
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:32
- RE: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:26
- Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Douglas Otis, 11:18
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Joel Jaeggli, 11:11
- RE: Charging I-Ds, Bob Braden, 11:07
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Eric Burger, 10:36
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, David W. Hankins, 10:36
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Douglas Otis, 10:27
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Ralph Droms, 09:30
- Re: Beggars _can_ be choosers?, Joel Jaeggli, 09:14
- Beggars _can_ be choosers?, David W. Hankins, 09:03
- RE: Charging I-Ds, Richard Shockey, 08:22
- Re: Funding (was Re: Charging I-Ds), Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 08:04
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Eric Rosen, 08:00
- Re: Funding (was Re: Charging I-Ds), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:51
- Re: Funding (was Re: Charging I-Ds), Suresh Krishnan, 07:43
- RE: Funding (was Re: Charging I-Ds), Steve Silverman, 07:39
- URN administration in draft-drage-sipping-service-identification-01, Atle Monrad (GR/ETO), 06:14
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Alexey Melnikov, 05:03
- RE: Charging I-Ds, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 00:16