Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)



Tony Finch wrote:

I don't understand how it can be easier to do anti-spam checks in an
IM2000 design than in current email.

It is always easier to create the perfect solution on paper, and then compareit to the imperfections of established practice.


Paper beats rock.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), (continued) Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Steven M. Bellovin Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Iljitsch van Beijnum RE: New models for email (Re: e2e), michael.dillon Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Tony Finch Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), John C Klensin Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Tony Finch Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Douglas Otis Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), SM Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker <= Re: e2e, Tony Finch Re: e2e, Keith Moore Re: e2e, Dave Crocker Re: e2e, Keith Moore Re: e2e, Douglas Otis Message not available RE: e2e, SM Re: e2e, Douglas Otis RE: e2e, michael.dillon Message not available RE: e2e, SM Re: e2e, Iljitsch van Beijnum

Previous by Date:	Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05, Dave Crocker
Next by Date:	Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), SM
Previous by Thread:	Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker
Next by Thread:	Re: e2e, Tony Finch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]