Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
2007-08-21 19:28:52
On Aug 21, 2007, at 4:59 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
I'm not convinced that is worth it --and strongly suspect it is
not-- but, if Doug believes otherwise, I'm looking forward to
seeing a proposal.
I hope to have a draft ready in the near future. When SMTP was
developed, HTTP did not exist in its present state. HTTP over a
clustered file system is now able to function as a separate message
channel for even the largest provider. This separate channel can
significantly lower the +90% levels of spam currently carried by
SMTP, while also substantially moving the burdens toward the sender
where it belongs.
Why change? When a sender is suspected of spamming, the receiving
MTA could limit exchanges to Transfer By Reference instead of issuing
an ultimately more expensive refusal or message acceptance. In the
case of TBR, SMTP would be limited to just exchanging an HTTP message
reference within the SMTP envelope. This separate HTTP channel
provides both delivery confirmation, and ensures the validity of the
reference.
Whether the message is accessed depends solely upon the reputation of
the HTTP publisher. Any additional information could be abused and
might require filtering. Filtering burdens the recipient, where bad
actors enjoy a significant advantage. Not relying upon filtering,
finding an identifier independent of the IP address, excluding
"friendly" information, and reducing the burden on the recipient are
the general guidelines.
As the message reaches the MDA, the MDA would have the option to
proxy access via BURL, fetch the message and revert to a normal SMTP
form, or convert the reference into a pseudo message compatible with
MUAs where recipients decide whether a message is to be accessed.
TBR does not prevent spam, however it significantly lowers the
recipient's burden and provides a simple means for avoiding unwanted
or spoofed messages. Details will follow in a draft.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e), (continued)
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e), michael.dillon
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Tony Finch
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), John C Klensin
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Tony Finch
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e),
Douglas Otis <=
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), SM
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e), Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e, Tony Finch
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore
- Re: e2e, Dave Crocker
- Re: e2e, Keith Moore
- Re: e2e, Douglas Otis
- Message not available
- RE: e2e, SM
- Re: e2e, Douglas Otis
|
|
|