no. the important point is that all users need to initially have enough
address space that they can attach not just multiple networks, but
multiple layers of networks, at that point. trying to define the
difference between the two types of end-users is silly. the reason that
IPv6 has so many bits in its address space is to allow for expansion at
the edges without making addresses variable length.
You missed the point in my mail completly. My only point was that we probably
need to split the /48 boundry into two, one for big or those who ask
for it, they
will all get a /48. And the standard that everyone get if they dont ask for a
/48.
I disagree. There's no technical justification for splitting the /48
boundary, and far too many advantages to standardizing on a single
prefix size for end users.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf