On 8/21/07, Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> wrote:
Roger Jørgensen wrote:
I am fully aware of that it will very likely be more than one subnet at some
point, that is why the last paragraph was included. Anyway, the important
point is that we probably should have two different type of end-users, big
and small.
no. the important point is that all users need to initially have enough
address space that they can attach not just multiple networks, but
multiple layers of networks, at that point. trying to define the
difference between the two types of end-users is silly. the reason that
IPv6 has so many bits in its address space is to allow for expansion at
the edges without making addresses variable length.
You missed the point in my mail completly. My only point was that we probably
need to split the /48 boundry into two, one for big or those who ask
for it, they
will all get a /48. And the standard that everyone get if they dont ask for a
/48.
--
Roger Jorgensen |
rogerj(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no | roger(_at_)jorgensen(_dot_)no
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf