On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:04:54 -0400
Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> wrote:
I'm not sure what your point is -- I took Keith's comment to mean
that home NATs with v6 were completely unacceptable.
/64's do NOT imply that there's NAT functionality involved, just
that there's
a single subnet, yes?
yes, but it's unreasonable to expect a home user to not need to
subnet. particularly when there are so many different media
competing for the home network space....it would be reasonable to
have a subnet for each medium.
I originally agreed with you on that. However, given modern switches,
I'm not nearly as convinced.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf