again, the fundamental problem here is that the RIRs are trying to
second-guess IETF design decisions.
"the" RIRs are membership organizations, with members
consisting of the operational community. they have to
try and work with whatever the IETF gives them.. and when
what the IETF provides is not operationaly feasable, they
can and will make changes so that an operational network
exists.
no demonstration has been made that what IETF provided is "not
operationally feasible". also, I suggest that the RIRs are only
considering operations from a narrow point-of-view.
now the IETF is a membership organization as well, so
individuals can participate in both communities.. if
you feel that an RIR policy is wrong, then the correct
place to "fix" it is within the RIR community.
perhaps, but if IETF has the problem that it's not willing to assert its
ownership over its own protocols, that problem is better addressed in
IETF than in ARIN.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf