% dig @ns.iana.org . axfr | grep "IN DS" | awk '{ print $1 }' | sort
| uniq
:-)
Regards,
-drc
On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:32 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Mark,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 10:54:41AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
This proposal is a way to move forward without waiting for
the politics of signing the root to resolve. This is
the classic case of the network routing around a blockage.
I do believe that it will eventually resolve but at glacial
pace.
Or is it helping the blockage to persist as there will be less
pressure to get this issue resolved ?
I suspect the answer to that is how many TLDs are waiting
for there to be somewhere to send their DNSKEYS/DS records?
IANA, I believe, would be the collector in either case. This
would, if nothing else, get that piece in place.
As the RIPE community stated in an earlier message to ICANN, blocking
the operational deployment of IETF technology is in fact undermining
the security and stability of the Internet
(http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/dns/icann-root-signing.pdf) and is
thereby a very serious issue. I much prefer to have the IAB and IESG
work on encouraging ICANN to get the root signed than that they (and
IANA) spend time and resources on "temporary" workarounds.
David Kessens
---
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf