This is odd! Do not understand why the IETF Secretariat did not forward
this request for help. Are you the correct body to provide an answer to
the question below?
________________________________
From: via RT [mailto:webmaster(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 11:25 AM
To: Herb Overstreet
Subject: [Inquiry #96698] Help!
Dear Herb,
The message below was sent to the IETF Secretariat who supports IETF in
operations and
processes.
If you need any technical advice, I'd suggest sending the message to the
IETF discussion list,
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_)
Regards,
Michael Lee,
IETF Secretariat.
[hoverstreet(_at_)kineticblue(_dot_)com - Thu Aug 23 09:27:09 2007]:
There is a discussion about mailto being a protocol. Can you settle this
for
us? I found http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2368, but there is one "have
an
answer for everything and I am right" person saying IEFT does not know
what
they are talking about. So, do you?
Herb Overstreet (herbO)
478-361-8374
avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000767-3, 08/21/2007
Tested on: 8/22/2007 2:57:48 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
________________________________
avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Inbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000768-5, 08/27/2007
Tested on: 8/27/2007 11:25:37 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
________________________________
avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000768-5, 08/27/2007
Tested on: 8/27/2007 2:17:16 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf