Sam Hartman wrote:
"Keith" == Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> writes:
>> Fourth, lots of folks (me included) happen to find it
>> convenient to use NAT between my site/house/office and my
>> upstream provider.
Keith> do you also find it "convenient" that NAT has effectively
Keith> thwarted the deployment of huge numbers of new
Keith> applications, significantly raised the cost of deploying
Keith> others, and harmed the reliability of all applications?
I find the tradeoffs work in favor of NAT; I expect this to be true
both for V4 and V6.
but how do you assign a value for those applications that cannot be run,
especially given the diverse needs of the Internet community?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf