On Oct 9, 2007, at 9:43 AM, Tony Li wrote:
Any new design would have necessarily required more bits to address
more end systems. Making legacy systems interact with these
additional addressing bits without some form of gateway, NAT or
other translation would indeed be challenging. You're literally
trying to expand the size of the namespace that a legacy
implementation will recognize.
32 bit AS numbers.
Regards,
-drc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf