ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: A pattented standard is not a standard

2007-10-26 12:11:50
from [Scott Brim] [Permanent Link] 
On 26 Oct 2007 at 11:35 -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip allegedly wrote:

Is this an official FSF campaign?


Half of them are CCed to fsf-campaign.  

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: A pattented standard is not a standard, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Date:  Re: A priori IPR choices, SM
Previous by Thread:  RE: A pattented standard is not a standard, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Thread:  Re: A pattented standard is not a standard, Bill Fenner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]