ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: A pattented standard is not a standard

2007-10-26 11:52:45
Is this an official FSF campaign?

My past experience is that RMS begins these campaigns before bothering to find 
out what the actual issues are. If RMS wants to influence the debate then he 
should join the debate here.

I am not very interested in RMS's opinion on a set of claims he has heard 
second hand from one supporter which he then relays third hand through other 
supporters.


-----Original Message-----
From: J. Pablo Fernández [mailto:pupeno(_at_)pupeno(_dot_)com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 7:48 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: A pattented standard is not a standard

Hello,

The idea of an standard is to make communication possible and 
easy. A pattented standard is a call for chaos or a tax on 
communication. I'm very much with the FSF in opposing TLS-authz.

Thank you.
--
J. Pablo Fernández <pupeno(_at_)pupeno(_dot_)com> (http://pupeno.com)

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>