Re: 2026, draft, full, etc.

  *> 
  *> One idea that was floated a couple of years ago, as part of a one-level
  *> standards track, was to retain the register of implementation reports
  *> (http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html) and mark the entries
  *> that have been approved by the IESG. The RFC index could then point to
  *> approved implementation reports, without any formal "promotion" needed.
  *> 
  *>     Brian
  *> 

Brian,

So, this implementation report registry would be analogous to the
current errata registry>  E.g., the RFC search engine would note
the existence of implementation reports for a particular RFC, just
as it now notes the existence of errata?

Bob Braden

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf