IETF Discussion (date)
November 30, 2007
- Re: IETF Eurasia, James M. Polk, 13:10
- RE: IETF Eurasia, James M. Polk, 13:07
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Bob Hinden, 12:58
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Brian E Carpenter, 12:27
- Re: IETF Eurasia, Lars Eggert, 09:35
- Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Sam Weiler, 07:10
- RE: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 05:28
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Harald Alvestrand, 04:46
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Tom.Petch, 04:15
November 29, 2007
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, rajesh rajesh, 23:27
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 22:54
- RE: Westin Vancouver Update, Yaakov Stein, 22:41
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Joel Jaeggli, 21:23
- RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Livingood, Jason, 15:20
- IETF 71 Info, Livingood, Jason, 15:16
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Adam Roach, 15:11
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis (Domain Name System (DNS)IANA Considerations) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:38
- RE: IETF Eurasia, Darryl \(Dassa\) Lynch, 14:29
- RE: Hotel selection, Livingood, Jason, 14:27
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis (Domain Name System (DNS)IANA Considerations) to BCP, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 14:17
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Pete Resnick, 13:38
- RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Livingood, Jason, 13:01
- RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Livingood, Jason, 12:57
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John C Klensin, 12:06
- Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Ted Hardie, 10:26
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker, 10:19
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman, 09:10
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Paul Hoffman, 08:59
- RE: IETF Eurasia, michael.dillon, 07:27
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, John C Klensin, 07:16
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, John C Klensin, 07:01
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, John C Klensin, 06:42
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Theodore Tso, 06:41
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman, 06:41
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Jari Arkko, 06:35
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Alexey Melnikov, 06:02
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John C Klensin, 06:02
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Dave Crocker, 05:21
- Re: IETF Eurasia, Adrian Farrel, 04:33
- Continental Distribution, Fred Baker, 04:24
- Re: IETF Eurasia, Fred Baker, 04:17
- IETF Eurasia, michael.dillon, 03:59
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Norbert Bollow, 03:14
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Eric Rescorla, 02:24
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Julian Reschke, 02:16
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:15
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:08
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Norbert Bollow, 01:51
November 28, 2007
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, John C Klensin, 23:57
- Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Cullen Jennings, 23:56
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Harald Alvestrand, 23:53
- Re: Hotel selection, Jari Arkko, 23:40
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John C Klensin, 22:40
- Hotel selection, Fred Baker, 22:14
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Bill Strahm, 21:57
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Pekka Savola, 21:57
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker, 21:45
- Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Spencer Dawkins, 21:31
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Fred Baker, 21:28
- Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Dave Crocker, 21:20
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker, 21:04
- Re: Missing materials, Frank Ellermann, 17:50
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Eric Rescorla, 17:40
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Frank Ellermann, 17:31
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman, 17:10
- Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-sip-uri-list-message-02.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 17:10
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman, 17:10
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Paul Hoffman, 16:20
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Tim Polk, 16:03
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Ned Freed, 15:45
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Eric Rescorla, 15:39
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Julian Reschke, 15:19
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman, 15:16
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Cullen Jennings, 15:16
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Ned Freed, 15:06
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Russ Housley, 15:05
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Leslie Daigle, 15:04
- Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Marshall Eubanks, 14:45
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:38
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Ted Hardie, 14:28
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Eric Rescorla, 14:19
- RE: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Wassim Haddad, 14:17
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, John C Klensin, 14:04
- Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Brian E Carpenter, 13:56
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:49
- Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, IETF Chair, 13:23
- Re: Missing materials, Eric Rescorla, 13:04
- RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:57
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Tony Li, 12:26
- Re: Missing materials, Frank Ellermann, 12:19
- Westin Vancouver Update, Ray Pelletier, 12:01
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Russ Housley, 11:48
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Lars Eggert, 11:38
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Russ Housley, 11:08
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Jari Arkko, 11:04
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Lars Eggert, 10:40
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Joel Jaeggli, 10:39
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Pete Resnick, 10:24
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Alexey Melnikov, 10:10
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Alexey Melnikov, 10:10
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Mohsen Souissi, 10:10
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Ole Jacobsen, 10:05
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Ole Jacobsen, 10:02
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker, 09:59
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Peter Sylvester, 09:58
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Alexey Melnikov, 09:55
- Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Lars Eggert, 09:41
- Missing materials, Eric Rescorla, 09:15
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker, 09:00
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John C Klensin, 07:41
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lars Eggert, 07:33
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis (Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:10
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Julian Reschke, 00:40
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker, 00:13
November 27, 2007
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Yangwoo Ko, 23:19
- RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, GOLDMAN, STUART O \(STUART\), 22:13
- IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Terry Monroe, 22:13
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Marshall Rose, 22:13
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker, 21:58
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker, 21:58
- RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Yaakov Stein, 21:24
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John Levine, 19:53
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, YAO, 18:47
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Fred Baker, 17:36
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Sam Weiler, 17:26
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Cullen Jennings, 16:10
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Ray Pelletier, 15:51
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Joel Jaeggli, 15:42
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Cullen Jennings, 15:35
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Eric Rescorla, 15:21
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Matt Lepinski, 15:21
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Tony Li, 15:11
- Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Pete Resnick, 15:07
- Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Yaakov Stein, 12:47
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Jari Arkko, 10:35
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Joe Abley, 10:27
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Dave Crocker, 09:59
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Jari Arkko, 09:10
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Sandy Ginoza, 08:42
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Derek Atkins, 08:42
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Marshall Rose, 08:42
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman, 08:33
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip4-vpn-problem-solution-03.txt, Suresh Krishnan, 07:41
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Jari Arkko, 04:47
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Jari Arkko, 04:47
- RE: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, WIJNEN, Bert \(Bert\), 02:38
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Lars Eggert, 01:21
November 26, 2007
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Spencer Dawkins, 22:26
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman, 20:57
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Noel Chiappa, 19:52
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Steven M. Bellovin, 18:34
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre, 16:10
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Brian E Carpenter, 15:05
- RE: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:37
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Henrik Levkowetz, 13:12
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lakshminath Dondeti, 11:56
- Audio Streaming - IETF 70 Vancouver BC Canada December 2-7, Joel Jaeggli, 11:52
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lakshminath Dondeti, 11:48
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Eric Rescorla, 11:48
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lakshminath Dondeti, 11:39
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Spencer Dawkins, 11:35
- RE: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:01
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Joel Jaeggli, 10:43
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Ned Freed, 08:42
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Eric Rescorla, 08:05
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, John C Klensin, 08:04
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla, 07:51
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Jari Arkko, 04:35
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Eliot Lear, 03:22
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03:21
November 25, 2007
- Energy and Networks, Bruce Nordman, 23:44
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla, 19:30
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Brian E Carpenter, 17:29
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla, 16:15
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Henrik Levkowetz, 15:59
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Mark Andrews, 15:53
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Eric Rescorla, 15:24
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Henrik Levkowetz, 15:11
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman, 15:11
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Jari Arkko, 15:00
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Jari Arkko, 14:51
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman, 14:51
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla, 14:48
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Henrik Levkowetz, 14:41
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Brian E Carpenter, 14:35
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Julian Reschke, 14:28
- Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman, 14:18
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla, 14:18
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Brian E Carpenter, 13:49
- Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Jari Arkko, 13:46
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla, 08:46
- Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard Aboba, 07:55
- Security area review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-08.txt, glenzorn, 06:46
- Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Hannes Tschofenig, 02:38
November 23, 2007
- Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Spencer Dawkins, 20:35
- Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Spencer Dawkins, 20:01
- Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lakshminath Dondeti, 15:52
- Re: Last Call: draft-wilde-sms-uri (URI Scheme for GSM Short Message Service) to Proposed Standard, Lisa Dusseault, 14:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-wilde-sms-uri (URI Scheme for GSM Short Message Service) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Newton, 13:31
- Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard Aboba, 07:09
November 22, 2007
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 22:55
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard_Aboba, 21:26
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-cheshire-ipv4-acd-05.txt, C. M. Heard, 17:27
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Cullen Jennings, 16:31
- Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard Aboba, 10:57
- Fwd: Africa and IPv6, Marc Manthey, 10:44
- Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:01
- TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard Aboba, 09:21
November 20, 2007
- Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Colin Perkins, 18:12
- Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Ted Hardie, 17:47
- Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, James M. Polk, 17:40
- Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Ted Hardie, 16:56
- Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Colin Perkins, 16:41
- Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Ted Hardie, 12:09
- draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-01.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:01
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 01:32
November 19, 2007
- Fwd: Africa and IPv6, rajesh rajesh, 21:43
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Brian E Carpenter, 19:57
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-toip-08.txt, Suresh Krishnan, 13:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-sjdcox-cgi-urn (A URN namespace for the Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information (CGI)) to Informational RFC, Tom.Petch, 11:24
- Fw: Last Call: draft-evain-ebu-urn (A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the European Broadcasting Union (EBU)) to Informational RFC, Tom.Petch, 09:35
November 16, 2007
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-cheshire-ipv4-acd-05.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 10:59
- Re: Africa and IPv6, philemon, 10:28
- Gen-ART review of draft-cheshire-ipv4-acd-05.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 09:41
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-evain-ebu-urn-01.txt, Evain, Jean-Pierre, 08:57
- Gen-ART review of draft-evain-ebu-urn-01.txt, Black_David, 08:57
- Re: Africa and IPv6, SM, 08:50
- Re: Africa and IPv6, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 08:39
- SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Colin Perkins, 07:00
- Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03:42
- RE: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, michael.dillon, 03:02
- Africa and IPv6, philemon, 02:48
November 15, 2007
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 22:53
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore, 19:18
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Stephen Sprunk, 17:31
- Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 15:46
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Sam Hartman, 15:00
- Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Sam Hartman, 15:00
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Jari Arkko, 13:24
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Tom.Petch, 13:09
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, David Kessens, 12:26
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch, 12:26
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore, 12:18
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:11
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Stephen Kent, 12:03
- Note on submitting non -00 drafts automatically, Philip Matthews, 10:54
- Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 10:46
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:56
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Noel Chiappa, 09:52
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Marc Manthey, 09:34
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Pekka Savola, 09:29
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore, 09:10
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després, 08:51
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Jari Arkko, 08:24
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, RJ Atkinson, 08:05
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, RJ Atkinson, 08:05
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Eliot Lear, 07:37
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch, 07:37
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore, 07:33
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:30
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Steven M. Bellovin, 06:53
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Spencer Dawkins, 06:49
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:38
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després, 02:17
- RE: terminology proposal: NAT+PT, Sheng Jiang, 00:51
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore, 00:48
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després, 00:36
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, David Kessens, 00:28
November 14, 2007
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch, 23:44
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Steven M. Bellovin, 19:47
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Sam Hartman, 19:23
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch, 17:27
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Steven M. Bellovin, 15:33
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch, 14:37
- RE: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:28
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore, 13:46
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Stephen Kent, 13:40
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT, Keith Moore, 13:32
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT, Stephen Sprunk, 13:07
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 11:21
- Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després, 09:42
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Francis Dupont, 09:24
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:15
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Lucy Lynch, 08:54
- RE: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:25
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Jari Arkko, 07:58
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch, 07:52
- Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 07:17
- NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, RJ Atkinson, 06:52
- Reject the "experimental" TLS authorization proposal, Ben Caplan, 06:52
- terminology proposal: NAT+PT, RJ Atkinson, 06:52
November 13, 2007
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Greg Skinner, 23:28
- NAT-PT (Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt), Harald Alvestrand, 21:52
- RE: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, michael.dillon, 13:44
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Thomas Narten, 12:25
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Eliot Lear, 11:32
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Tom.Petch, 11:21
- Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04:48
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Mohsen Souissi, 04:42
November 12, 2007
- RE: New web-based submission tool, Janet P Gunn, 14:33
- Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:23
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Noel Chiappa, 11:15
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Pars Mutaf, 10:32
- Re: New web-based submission tool, Tim Chown, 10:04
- Re: New web-based submission tool, Dave Crocker, 09:54
- RE: New web-based submission tool, Eric Gray, 09:33
- Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Thomas Narten, 09:32
- FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 07:36
- Re: [PSAMP] FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-protocol (Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications) to Proposed Standard, Benoit Claise, 07:29
- [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-oam-req-frmk-09, Tobias Gondrom, 07:29
- RE: [Sipping] Last Call: draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples (SessionInitiation Protocol Service Examples) to BCP, Henry Sinnreich, 07:29
- secdir review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-reqts-05.txt, Stephen Hanna, 07:29
- RE: [Sipping] Last Call: draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples (Ses sion Initiation Protocol Service Examples) to BCP, Hutton, Andrew, 07:29
- New web-based submission tool, Tim Chown, 06:54
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Alexey Melnikov, 03:18
November 08, 2007
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 22:53
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 16:24
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, Sam Hartman, 10:55
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Sam Hartman, 10:52
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre, 09:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko, 03:32
- RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema forMedia Control) to Informational RFC, Even, Roni, 00:50
November 07, 2007
- More Vancouver Hotels, Lyndon Nerenberg, 20:19
- Re: Hotels in YVR, Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:54
- Hotels in YVR, lconroy, 19:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bill Fenner, 18:22
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre, 16:48
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bernard Aboba, 12:33
- Re: I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Noel Chiappa, 12:24
- RE: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:02
- Re: I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Byung-Hee HWANG, 11:59
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, SM, 10:48
- RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC, Hollenbeck, Scott, 10:18
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz, 10:12
- I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Franky Almonte, 09:09
- Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp-05.txt, JP Vasseur, 09:05
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Cullen Jennings, 09:05
- RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, michael.dillon, 08:23
- Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Dave Crocker, 08:16
- IETF Liaison to ITU-NGN, Joe Abley, 08:09
- Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Theodore Tso, 08:00
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Thomas Narten, 07:27
- RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Eric Gray, 07:06
- RE: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), michael.dillon, 06:04
- Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Henrik Levkowetz, 05:42
- RE: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), michael.dillon, 05:02
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz, 04:34
- Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Stephen Farrell, 04:27
- RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen, 04:25
- Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Jari Arkko, 04:21
- RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, michael.dillon, 03:40
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre, 02:55
- RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen, 01:30
- RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen, 01:27
November 06, 2007
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, John C Klensin, 20:52
- Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 20:19
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, SM, 18:15
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko, 15:08
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: Re:I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre, 14:57
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:37
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:37
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Jari Arkko, 14:08
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre, 13:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-goodwin-iso-urn (A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)) to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann, 12:50
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bill Fenner, 12:21
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Michelle Cotton, 12:05
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko, 10:33
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Ted Hardie, 10:29
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Russ Housley, 10:21
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bernard Aboba, 08:02
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lars Eggert, 07:56
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Hannes Tschofenig, 07:54
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:38
- RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, michael.dillon, 07:21
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:33
- RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen, 06:31
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:25
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Jari Arkko, 06:04
- Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Norbert Bollow, 05:09
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko, 03:45
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Lars Eggert, 01:36
November 05, 2007
- Re: Last Call: draft-korhonen-mip6-service (Service Selection for Mobile IPv6) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 17:21
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter, 17:09
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Frank Ellermann, 15:36
- Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Brian E Carpenter, 14:12
- Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Spencer Dawkins, 12:24
- Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Keith Moore, 10:15
- Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Steven M. Bellovin, 10:13
- RE: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Lawrence Rosen, 09:47
- FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech (Sampling and Filtering Techniques for IP Packet Selection) to Proposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 09:01
- FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-protocol (Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications) to Proposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 02:50
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz, 02:38
November 04, 2007
- Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., John C Klensin, 23:53
- Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 22:24
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Dave Crocker, 13:02
- RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger, 10:02
- RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Eric Burger, 09:51
November 03, 2007
- Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Dave Crocker, 13:04
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lyndon Nerenberg, 12:28
- Re: tools everywhere, Frank Ellermann, 11:54
- Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:38
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:38
- Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, John C Klensin, 09:45
- Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Dave Crocker, 07:02
- New IETF Journal available now, Mirjam Kuehne, 02:38
November 02, 2007
- Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Brian E Carpenter, 18:52
- Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Scott O. Bradner, 18:52
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:13
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, SM, 14:45
- tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Scott O. Bradner, 14:01
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Joel M. Halpern, 13:48
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Olafur Gudmundsson, 13:48
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lixia Zhang, 13:02
- Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Brian E Carpenter, 13:02
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, John C Klensin, 13:02
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz, 12:42
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Steven M. Bellovin, 12:42
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: PerformanceMetrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Randy Presuhn, 11:04
- RE: 2026, draft, full, etc., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:42
- Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Bob Braden, 10:07
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Joel M. Halpern, 10:05
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Bill Sommerfeld, 09:55
- Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, John C Klensin, 09:55
- Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Ned Freed, 09:49
- Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen, 06:22
- Re: Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Ben Finney, 02:29
November 01, 2007
- Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Eliot Lear, 23:55
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 22:13
- Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu, 22:13
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Alexander Terekhov, 18:12
- Re: About referenced documents..., Chris Grigg, 18:12
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Richard Stallman, 18:12
- Re: Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Ben Finney, 18:12
- Opposing tls-authz-extns, Alessandro Forghieri, 18:12
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Russ Nelson, 18:12
- Re: Experimental track, Frank Ellermann, 16:14
- Re: Free? Software Foundation, Stefanos Harhalakis, 15:13
- Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Peter Saint-Andre, 14:37
- Re: Experimental track, Brian E Carpenter, 14:37
- Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Brian E Carpenter, 14:24
- Re: About referenced documents..., Brian E Carpenter, 14:17
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Brian E Carpenter, 13:54
- Re: About referenced documents..., Randy Presuhn, 11:31
- Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu, 11:08
- Re: [saag] Minor addition to draft-williams-on-channel-binding; one week to respond, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 10:24
- Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Sam Hartman, 08:20
- RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:04
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Scott Brim, 06:46
- RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: PerformanceMetrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Dan Schutzer, 06:37
- RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 06:08
- Re: About referenced documents..., Frank Ellermann, 04:05
- Experimental track (was: Non-participants), Frank Ellermann, 04:05
- Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Simon Josefsson, 01:56
- Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Dan Riley, 00:28