Ned Freed <ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com> writes:
And even if they have read tls-authz it is hard to take comments
containing oxymorons like "experimental standard" very seriously,
since such comments are a strong indicator of lack of familiarity
with our process or 2026 criteria.
While I am sympathetic to that sentiment, there is some evidence that
people presumably well versed in IETF process and RFC2026 terminology
can be sloppy in its application--from
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg04120.html
Subject: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary at ietf.org>
[...]
The IESG solicits final comments on whether the IETF community has
consensus to publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as an
_experimental standard_ given the IPR claimed.
(_emphasis_ added)
-dan
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf