Brian E Carpenter wrote:
pretty clearly a cut-and-paste error. I agree that we
can't expect non-participants to correct that error.
+1
For a definition of "non-participant" somewhere between
"did not yet read RFC 4677" and "did not yet read all
RFCs listed in ion-procdoc" (including 3669, I checked
that you have it... ;-)
[experimental track]
There's nothing new about that phrase; a quick Google
finds usage going back to 1998 at least.
My http://purl.net/xyzzy/-a9/%22experimental%20track%22
search found about 120 hits from potential participants.
Frank
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf