--On Wednesday, 12 December, 2007 17:05 -0800 Ned Freed
<ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com> wrote:
I would prefer to have a reference to 2822upd, but I suspect
this decision dates back to when it wasn't clear that 2822bis
was going to get updated more or less at the same time.
This is, of course, the sort of thing that can be changed in an
RFC Editor note if, in fact, 2822 is ready and more or less
concurrent.
That's what i was hoping you'd say - if 2822upd is ready such a change would be
a very good thing IMO.
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf