On Fri Jan 18 20:53:25 2008, Chris Lonvick wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Bob Braden wrote:
*>
*> Section 4.4, second paragraph (s/may/MAY)
*> Only a single PARTIAL search return option may be present
in a single
*> command.
*> Should this be:
*> Only a single PARTIAL search return option MAY be present
in a single
*> command.
*>
*>
*> Best regards,
*> Chris
"can be"?
That's possible - I think that the authors need to clarify it
better.
It may be May be or may be can be or doo be shoo whop. :-)
This one does need clarification - I try to use RFC2119 language
sparingly, in an attempt to make it stand out better, but in this
case it's needed. "may" was English, rather than RFC2119. Another way
of phrasing would be (and including a minor clarification):
"A single command MUST NOT contain more than one PARTIAL or ALL
search return option."
Dave.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf