[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

2008-03-25 12:44:45

Russ Housley wrote:

Raising a technical problem anonymously does not seem to be a 
concern.  However, there could be significant IPR problems with 
anonymous solutions to technical problems.

It is my understanding that IETF is already in this type of problems.

Solutions contributed by employees of large organizations could be 
problematic, as soon as unpublished patent applications are considered 
confidential corporate trade secrets circulated on a "need-to-know" 
basis, which is recommended practice by patent practitioners anyway.

Sometimes one wonders even about published patent applications, 
especially when a US patent agent expects broad claims to be tailored to 
the prior art in the course of examination - hardly anyone from the 
corporation would be allowed to make well-informed statements about the 
connection of the patent application to an SDO activity.

In practice, I suspect that many corporations abstain from contributing 
to IETF in specific standardization areas where they have an IPR 
strategy, and so the scope of IETF activities - and achievements - is 


IETF mailing list


- Thierry Moreau

CONNOTECH Experts-conseils inc.
9130 Place de Montgolfier
Montreal, Qc
Canada   H2M 2A1

Tel.: (514)385-5691
Fax:  (514)385-5900

web site:
e-mail: thierry(_dot_)moreau(_at_)connotech(_dot_)com

IETF mailing list