Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: Peter Constable <petercon(_at_)microsoft(_dot_)com>
> Frankly, it strikes me as somewhat odd that a body acting as a
> standards-setting organization with public impact might allow any
> technical decision on its specifications to be driven by people
> operating under a cloak of anonymity. Expressing an anonymous
> [criticism]? No problem. Influencing determination of a consensus with
> public impact? That should not be allowed, IMO.
So I've never met you, Noel. And I certainly don't have any reason to
believe that this email I'm responding to wasn't forged. How do I know
that you're not a dog?
IETF mailing list