Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

I'd prefer an IETF that serves the larger community over one that  
caters
only to the few frequent contributors.


I'd prefer an IETF that can get things done in a timely manner.

Regards,
-drc

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, (continued) Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Stephan Wenger Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Simon Josefsson Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Noel Chiappa Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Michael Thomas Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Melinda Shore Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Edward Lewis Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Melinda Shore Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Edward Lewis Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Theodore Tso Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Simon Josefsson Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, David Conrad <= Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Doug Ewell Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Joel Jaeggli Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Bert Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, John C Klensin Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Noel Chiappa Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Michael Thomas RE: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Hadriel Kaplan Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Noel Chiappa