Simon Josefsson wrote:
*KICK* ;-) Posted yesterday:
Hm, how does those rules meet any of the requirements Noel had?
Hardly, but now is a good time to discuss the proposed rules,
where they don't do what folks consider as required. I think
there are enough "interesting" details in the "incoming" I-D
that adding missing rules about "anon contributors" would be
IETF mailing list