Simon Josefsson wrote:
*KICK* ;-) Posted yesterday:
Hm, how does those rules meet any of the requirements Noel had?
Hardly, but now is a good time to discuss the proposed rules,
where they don't do what folks consider as required. I think
there are enough "interesting" details in the "incoming" I-D
that adding missing rules about "anon contributors" would be
overkill.
Frank
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf