ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC Errata proposals -- a missing piece

2008-06-02 15:28:19
At 11:37 PM +0200 6/2/08, Frank Ellermann wrote:
If what you propose boils down to "the errata should have a
backlink to the HTML version and/or to the RFC meta data"
it is of course fine, that is one simple global fix to the
errata user interface.

That works for me.

Apparently John's proposal was about the at least 60 days
between the approval of an obsoleting / updating RFC, and
the time when it gets its number.  For RFCs blocked by a
MISSREF that could be years or forever.  For RFCs killed
by an appeal it is forever, intentionally.

The RFC metadata referred to above could be updated at the time a new 
RFC is approved in its stream, not at the time the RFC itself is 
published.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf