On 6/25/2008 4:28 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Thursday, 26 June, 2008 09:41 +1200 Brian E Carpenter
<brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
...
And of course, individual ADs
have to think carefully whether a given issue is or is not
worthy of a DISCUSS, and sometimes they get it wrong. But
that will always be true, however we tune the process and
procedures.
Brian,
While I agree with this, I also believe that there have to be
effective safeguards against bad judgments prevailing for too
long. And I believe that those have largely slipped away from
us... unless we believe that making changes, unvalidated by WG
or mailing list consensus, simply to get a DISCUSS removed is
the right way to get to "high quality, relevant technical and
engineering documents...".
Indeed that is the issue!
regards,
Lakshminath
john
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf