Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity

ietf

Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity

2008-06-29 19:33:08



Randy Presuhn wrote:

English is not case sensitive.


Not so.  Case has long been used for emphasis in environments
lacking other typographical means, such as bolding, underlining,
or italicization.



Emphasis is not semantics.

Normative intent is semantic.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, (continued) SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Eric Gray SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, C. M. Heard Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Randy Presuhn Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Keith Moore Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Randy Presuhn Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker <= RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Eric Gray Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Spencer Dawkins Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Ralph Droms Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07), Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Dave Cridland

Previous by Date:	Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad
Next by Date:	Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bill Manning
Previous by Thread:	Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Randy Presuhn
Next by Thread:	RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Eric Gray
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]