ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

2008-06-29 19:47:21

I'm suggesting it would be helpful if there were an RFC directing IANA  
to establish a registry that contains both labels and rules (e.g, no  
all-numeric strings, no strings that start with 0x and contain  
hexadecimal values, the string 'xn--', the 2606 strings, etc.) that  
specify what cannot be placed into the root zone.  As part of future  
IANA actions, any time a protocol defines a new TLD (e.g., .local) an  
entry should be placed into that registry.

Would there be the downside to this?

        several come to mind...

        heres one.  wrt numeric strings, you have examples of the ambiguity
        in implementations on -how- to process non-base 10 numbers.  but
        it is clear that hex encoding is -not- tossed out.  how 'bout octal?
        or base 36?  are numeric string representations now, after 30 years
        going to be outlawed? if so, on what basis?

        creating a useful RFC that creates a registry and maintains it in a 
timely
        fashion -in this century- seems a bedtime fable.


-- 
--bill

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf