ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

2008-07-08 18:52:22

It's nonsensical for an application to decide that relative names are 
unacceptable, but to require users to input names as relative.

it's nonsensical for you to unilaterally declare that such names are 
relative, when well over two decades of practice indicates otherwise.

I didn't declare it; 1034 did. 

        And RFC 1535 got resolvers to try search lists last if there
        was a period in the name.   This removed the need for final
        periods for any legal fully qualified host name.

        "hk" is not a legal fully qualified host name.  Demanding that
        applications support final dots to support uses that are outside
        of the original design scope is nonsensical.

        Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf