*>
*> > * was not even examined in the "requirements" review
*> > that led up to RFC 1123 and is not referenced there.
*>
*> RFC 1123 -> RFC 952 -> RFC 921
*>
Your "->" arrows here apparently mean only "contains a reference to".
This is not an explicit dependence relationship like "updates" or
"obsoletes", and nothing can be imfered from "contains a reference
to" except thaton Postel was academically thorough.
Bob Braden
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf