Russ Housley wrote:
Harald:
I'd like to see this discussed on the rfc-interest mail list.
Previously, you suggested that all errata and their disposition be
available for historical review, regardless of the state that the
errata is put into. I think that this is the plan, but these details
are for the RFC Editor to implement.
OK - message forwarded to rfc-interest.
The answers affect whether or not I think the suggested IESG process is
reasonable, which is why I was asking the questions.
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf